如是說999

  2018-10-09

之一《新加坡警告精英統治的負面影響》 

之二《來自巴西的緊急要求》 

《洛克菲勒家族的負責人是誰？》

  2018年10月6日

《新加坡警告精英統治的負面影響》

親愛的本傑明，

請參考以下文章：

https://mothership.sg/2018/10/meritocracy-privilege-elitism-intolerance-problems/

雖然把未來的計劃機構設想成精英管理原則聽起來不錯，但特權和精英主義這兩個問題必須被視為精英管理的主要障礙。

否則，這將是一個全球性的案例，新加坡就是一個好例子。是的，這個國家很繁榮，很先進。但代價是什麼呢？誰來為無家可歸者說話？誰來幫助失業者？誰來照顧晚熟人的福利？答案是：沒有人。

這裏的普遍態度是，用新加坡英語來說：「你死你事」，或者「自私自利。」這是務實的精英管理，就像新加坡的實踐一樣。

白龍會的未來規劃機構必須研究精英管理的負面影響，尤其是從新加坡的基層開始，並制定出有效解決這些問題的遊戲計劃。僅僅把新加坡作為世界其他地區的一盞明燈來反復強調是不夠的，同時還能很方便地避開那些失敗的人；更不用提新加坡人所厭惡的「緊身衣社會」了。

謝謝，

-M君上

嗨，M君：

是的，我很清楚新加坡在很多方面都很不完美，我們計劃使用他們系統中最好的部份，但也打算建立一個基於世界各地最佳實踐的安全網；例如，北歐風格的國家（Scandinavian）。

本傑明

嗨，本傑明，

謝謝你的澄清。希望不久能發表一份關於未來規劃機構遠景的白皮書，並邀請公眾進行有意義的合作，使其變得更好。

-M君上

【原文】2018-10-06 Benjamin Fulford

《Warning from Singapore about Negatives of Meritocracy》

Dear Ben,

Please reference the following article:

https://mothership.sg/2018/10/meritocracy-privilege-elitism-intolerance-problems/

While it may sound like a good idea to envision the future planning agency on meritocratic principles, the twin issues of privilege and elitism MUST be acknowledged as major stumbling blocks in meritocracy.

Otherwise, it will be a global case of what has been/is happening locally in Singapore. Yes, the country is prosperous. Yes, the country is advanced. But at what cost? Who here speaks for the homeless? Who here helps the jobless? Who here looks after the welfare of late bloomers? Answer: No one.

The general attitude here is 「you die, your business」 in Singlish, or 「every man for himself」 in English. THAT is pragmatic meritocracy as practiced in Singapore.

The future planning agency of the WDS MUST look into the negatives of meritocracy, especially from the ground level in Singapore, and come up with game plans to effectively tackle these issues. It is not sufficient to repeatedly hold the Singapore example up as a shining beacon to the rest of the world while conveniently sidestepping those who have fallen through the cracks; never mind the 「straitjacket society」 that Singaporeans are loathe to live in.

Cheers,

—M

——————

Hi M:

Yes, I am fully aware that Singapore is far from perfect in many ways. We are planning to use the best parts of their system, but also intend to have a safety net based on best practices from around the world; for example, the Scandinavian countries.

—BF

——————

Hi Ben,

Thank you for the clarification. Hopefully, a white paper could be published soon on the vision of the future planning agency, together with a public invitation for meaningful collaboration to make it even better.

—M

翻譯: 醒覺大勢頭

資料來源:http://blog.udn.com/17ab68df/117511037

 (图文来自网络，版权属于原创)